Wednesday April 04, 2018

Serif vs sans serif? Let’s settle the battle once and for all

Choosing between serif vs sans serif is an age-old dilemma that still fazes many printers and graphic designers. Or, better said, it has been a dilemma ever since someone invented the first sans serif type, somewhere around 1925 – rumor has it, it had something to do with the Bauhaus Dessau designed by Herbert Bayer. Anyway, contrary to what many readers assume, the serif vs sans serif issue is not just a matter of taste. There is a strong case to be made for both types of font, depending on the context they’re used in.

When in print, choose serif

Although serif fonts have a more decorative look than sans serif fonts, those little horizontal lines finishing off the strokes of each letter actually do serve a purpose. Serifs, as these lines are called, make large blocks of texts more readable as they help the eye travel horizontally. (That said, not all serif fonts are more legible than sans serif fonts per se. Compare a sans serif font like Helvetica to a serif font like ITC Kallos and you’ll catch our drift.)

Oddly enough, the reverse is true when texts are published online. As monitors typically show around 100 dpi – whereas print usually has a resolution of 300 dpi and up – sans serif fonts are much more readable on the web than serif fonts. It must be said, though, that monitors are catching up in the dpi department. Nowadays, ‘retina’ and ‘5K’ displays have a far greater pixel density, which creates a dilemma: do you opt for a serif font and make your text extra legible on newer devices, or do you continue catering to older devices (which still make up the majority)? This is where digital analytics come in handy.

… but mind the size

In the case of small text (8.5 to 11 point), however, sans serif is the better option both on screen and in print. Serifs simply don’t always survive the printing process when they’re teeny-tiny. The same is true for serif fonts printed as reversed type.

… as well as the reader

Do you need to print text for the visually impaired or for children learning to read? Then sans serif is better option, as the shapes of the letters are more easily recognizable.

Don't want to miss anything? Subscribe now!

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter and get the latest Enfocus articles delivered to your inbox.

(*) Required field. By submitting this form, you confirm that you have reviewed and agree with the Enfocus general terms, conditions, EULA and privacy policy.

About Andrew Bailes-Collins

PitStop Pro 2018

Andrew Bailes-Collins is Senior Product Manager at Enfocus.

He graduated from what is now the London College of Communications and went on to serve an apprenticeship as a compositor. He has worked for a number of vendors in the printing and publishing sector, including Scangraphic, Apple and DuPont/Crosfield.

Andrew has been Prepress Manager for several high-quality printing companies in London, managing the change from conventional production techniques to digital. An early adopter of computer-to-plate and PDF workflow, Andrew then worked at OneVision Software for ten years. Initially based in the UK, before rising through the company to become Head of Product Management Europe at their head office near Munich in Germany.

Andrew joined Enfocus and moved to Belgium in 2011 and is the Senior Product Manager responsible for the PitStop family of products. He is also the Technical Officer for the Ghent Workgroup and Co-Chair of the GWG specifications sub-committee.

Read more about:

Sign in or create an Enfocus ID to post comments